GeForce 9500M GS vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with GeForce 9500M GS, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
36.13
+10223%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms 9500M GS by a whopping 10223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1411308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.521.20
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU104G84
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 February 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307232
Core clock speed1035 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate296.67.600
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.0608 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs19216
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.51.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Mobile 36.13
+10223%
9500M GS 0.35

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 5000 Mobile 54153
+6175%
9500M GS 863

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+13100%
1−2
−13100%
1440p840−1
4K540−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+4800%
2−3
−4800%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+4800%
2−3
−4800%
Battlefield 5 165
+16400%
1−2
−16400%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Far Cry 5 128
+12700%
1−2
−12700%
Fortnite 150−160
+14900%
1−2
−14900%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+4233%
3−4
−4233%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+1814%
7−8
−1814%
Valorant 200−210
+688%
24−27
−688%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+4800%
2−3
−4800%
Battlefield 5 162
+16100%
1−2
−16100%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1879%
14−16
−1879%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Dota 2 98
+880%
10−11
−880%
Far Cry 5 123
+12200%
1−2
−12200%
Fortnite 150−160
+14900%
1−2
−14900%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+4233%
3−4
−4233%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+11400%
1−2
−11400%
Metro Exodus 99 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+1814%
7−8
−1814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+4425%
4−5
−4425%
Valorant 200−210
+688%
24−27
−688%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 152
+15100%
1−2
−15100%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Dota 2 92
+820%
10−11
−820%
Far Cry 5 115
+11400%
1−2
−11400%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+4233%
3−4
−4233%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+1814%
7−8
−1814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
Valorant 181
+596%
24−27
−596%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+14900%
1−2
−14900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+11450%
2−3
−11450%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 0−1
Metro Exodus 59 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+8650%
2−3
−8650%
Valorant 240−250
+11900%
2−3
−11900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 124
+12300%
1−2
−12300%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 102 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+9100%
1−2
−9100%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+6000%
1−2
−6000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+360%
14−16
−360%
Metro Exodus 37 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 0−1
Valorant 200−210
+10050%
2−3
−10050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 100−105 0−1
Far Cry 5 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and 9500M GS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 13100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 10050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5000 Mobile surpassed 9500M GS in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.13 0.35
Recency 27 May 2019 1 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 10222.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

9500M GS, on the other hand, has 450% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9500M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 9500M GS is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
GeForce 9500M GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 37 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9500M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or GeForce 9500M GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.