ATI Radeon X1050 vs Quadro RTX 4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	103	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	36.54	no data
Power efficiency	17.28	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code name	TU104	RV370
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 November 2018 (5 years ago)	7 December 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$899	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	no data
Core clock speed	1005 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	24 Watt
Texture fill rate	222.5	1.600
Floating-point processing power	7.119 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	144	4
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1625 MHz	333 MHz
Memory bandwidth	416.0 GB/s	5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	9.0
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	13 November 2018	7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	24 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---