Radeon R7 350 vs Quadro RTX 4000

Place in the ranking	107	601
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	36.25	no data
Power efficiency	17.31	7.07
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	TU104	Cape Verde
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 November 2018 (6 years ago)	6 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$899	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	512
Core clock speed	1005 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	222.5	25.60
Floating-point processing power	7.119 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	144	32
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	168 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1625 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	416.0 GB/s	72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.72	5.58
Recency	13 November 2018	6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	55 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 611.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350, on the other hand, has 190.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.