Radeon Pro V540 vs Quadro RTX 4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.29no data
Power efficiency16.96no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042304 ×2
Core clock speed1005 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5230.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6464 ×2
TMUs144144 ×2
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 225 Watt

RTX 4000 has 40.6% lower power consumption.

Pro V540, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon Pro V540. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon Pro V540
Radeon Pro V540

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 497 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon Pro V540, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.