GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro RTX 4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.40no data
Power efficiency17.22no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameTU104NV25 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years ago)6 February 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1005 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Wattno data
Texture fill rate222.52.000
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1448
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15351
+306920%
GeForce4 Ti 4200 5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2018 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

RTX 4000 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 and GeForce4 Ti 4200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce4 Ti 4200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce4 Ti 4200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 479 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 32 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.