GeForce Go 6150 vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Go 6100 Go 6100 + nForce Go 430 Go 6150 Go 6150 + nForce Go 430 Go 6200 Go 6250 Go 6400 Go 6600 Go 6600 NPB 128M Go 6600 TE Go 6800 Go 6800 Ultra

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with GeForce Go 6150, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.72
+79340%

RTX 4000 outperforms Go 6150 by a whopping 79340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 4000 RTX 4000
Go 6150 Go 6150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1071474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.25no data
Power efficiency17.31no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU104C51MV
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043
Core clock speed1005 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Wattno data
Texture fill rate222.5no data
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1625 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)shared Memory
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 39.72
+79340%
Go 6150 0.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15322
+80542%
Go 6150 19

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 29 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.72 0.05
Recency 13 November 2018 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 12 nm 110 nm

RTX 4000 has a 79340% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while GeForce Go 6150 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150
GeForce Go 6150
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
Go 6150 GeForce Go 6150
vs
ATI Xpress 200M Radeon Xpress 200M
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro W6800X Radeon Pro W6800X
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
vs
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
RX 560 XT Radeon RX 560 XT
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
RX 560 XT Radeon RX 560 XT
vs
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
GMA GMA
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
RTX 4060 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Mobile
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 483 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 11 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.