GeForce MX570 A vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with GeForce MX570 A, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
34.13
+113%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms MX570 A by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155339
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.3644.06
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU104GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1110 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate249.673.92
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs16064
Tensor Cores32064
Ray Tracing Cores4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD109
+118%
50−55
−118%
1440p61
+126%
27−30
−126%
4K49
+133%
21−24
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Elden Ring 110−120
+134%
50−55
−134%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+135%
40−45
−135%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+113%
75−80
−113%
Metro Exodus 103
+129%
45−50
−129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Valorant 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Dota 2 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Elden Ring 110−120
+134%
50−55
−134%
Far Cry 5 89
+123%
40−45
−123%
Fortnite 150−160
+123%
70−75
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+113%
75−80
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Metro Exodus 51
+143%
21−24
−143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+121%
85−90
−121%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+134%
50−55
−134%
Valorant 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%
World of Tanks 270−280
+114%
130−140
−114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+131%
35−40
−131%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Dota 2 127
+131%
55−60
−131%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+128%
40−45
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+113%
75−80
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+121%
85−90
−121%
Valorant 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Elden Ring 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
World of Tanks 210−220
+118%
100−105
−118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+143%
30−33
−143%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+116%
50−55
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%
Metro Exodus 77
+120%
35−40
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Valorant 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Dota 2 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Elden Ring 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+116%
50−55
−116%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+117%
18−20
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Dota 2 106
+136%
45−50
−136%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Fortnite 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%
Valorant 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and MX570 A compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 118% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 126% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 133% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.13 16.00
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 113.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

MX570 A, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 340% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 A in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 A is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 58 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.