UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
26.22
+940%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) by a whopping 940% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking208826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.8525.09
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTU106Lakefield GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)28 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230464
Core clock speed945 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7no data
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.22
+940%
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 2.52

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+1010%
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1792

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+1046%
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1296

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+987%
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 8409

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
+623%
13
−623%
4K88
+1000%
8−9
−1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+863%
8−9
−863%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 85−90
+2767%
3−4
−2767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+871%
7−8
−871%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+1158%
12−14
−1158%
Hitman 3 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+500%
20−22
−500%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+4400%
2−3
−4400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+709%
10−12
−709%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+186%
35−40
−186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+613%
8−9
−613%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 85−90
+2767%
3−4
−2767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+871%
7−8
−871%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+1158%
12−14
−1158%
Hitman 3 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+500%
20−22
−500%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+4400%
2−3
−4400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+709%
10−12
−709%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+331%
12−14
−331%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+186%
35−40
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+388%
8−9
−388%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+1158%
12−14
−1158%
Hitman 3 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+500%
20−22
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+709%
10−12
−709%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+331%
12−14
−331%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+186%
35−40
−186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+971%
14−16
−971%
Hitman 3 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+671%
7−8
−671%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+1060%
5−6
−1060%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+873%
14−16
−873%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Hitman 3 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+1017%
12−14
−1017%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 623% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 1000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.22 2.52
Recency 27 May 2019 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 7 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 940.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1042.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 277 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.