GeForce MX570 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
26.26
+76.4%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms MX570 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking210355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.4940.81
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU106GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed945 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate198.773.92
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs14464
Tensor Cores28864
Ray Tracing Cores3616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.26
+76.4%
GeForce MX570 14.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+76.4%
GeForce MX570 5735

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+89.1%
55−60
−89.1%
4K88
+95.6%
45−50
−95.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+87%
21−24
−87%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+126%
30−35
−126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+79.2%
45−50
−79.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+87%
21−24
−87%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+65.9%
40−45
−65.9%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+57.3%
95−100
−57.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+57.9%
75−80
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+65.9%
40−45
−65.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+85.4%
45−50
−85.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+35.9%
75−80
−35.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+67.6%
30−35
−67.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+79.2%
45−50
−79.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+87%
21−24
−87%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+65.9%
40−45
−65.9%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+57.3%
95−100
−57.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+57.9%
75−80
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+65.9%
40−45
−65.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+85.4%
45−50
−85.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+60%
35−40
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+35.9%
75−80
−35.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+87%
21−24
−87%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+57.3%
95−100
−57.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+57.9%
75−80
−57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+85.4%
45−50
−85.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+60%
35−40
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+35.9%
75−80
−35.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+65.9%
40−45
−65.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+73.9%
21−24
−73.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+94.8%
75−80
−94.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+92.3%
24−27
−92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+60.4%
90−95
−60.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Hitman 3 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+81.1%
70−75
−81.1%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+80%
20−22
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 89% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 96% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3000 Mobile surpassed GeForce MX570 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.26 14.89
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 76.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 288 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.