GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking208not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.66no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU106TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)18 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304896
Core clock speed945 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate198.789.04
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14456
Tensor Cores288112
Ray Tracing Cores3614

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 18 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 90 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 TU106, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 275 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 273 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.