Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19203456
Core clock speed945 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate165.6432.0
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs120216
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores3054

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB28 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 158 Watt

PRO V710 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 1.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.