Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameTU106Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192019456
Core clock speed945 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate165.62,554
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs64no data
TMUs1201216
Tensor Cores2401216
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB192 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 750 Watt

RTX 3000 X2 Mobile has 368.8% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Instinct MI300X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 57 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.