Radeon Pro W6600M vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
VS
Radeon Pro W5300M Radeon Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W6300M Radeon Pro W6600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and Radeon Pro W6600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3000 Max-Q
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
18.41

Pro W6600M outperforms RTX 3000 Max-Q by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q
Pro W6600M Pro W6600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking272207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.3522.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed600 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate175.0227.8
Floating-point processing power5.599 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144112
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores3628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 18.41
Pro W6600M 25.79
+40.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 8224
Pro W6600M 11524
+40.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD73
−37%
100−110
+37%
1440p45
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
4K29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−40%
160−170
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−44.2%
60−65
+44.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−48.8%
60−65
+48.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−29.3%
100−110
+29.3%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−40%
160−170
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−44.2%
60−65
+44.2%
Far Cry 5 87
−5.7%
90−95
+5.7%
Fortnite 100−110
−25.7%
130−140
+25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−39.1%
85−90
+39.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−48.8%
60−65
+48.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−46.1%
110−120
+46.1%
Valorant 140−150
−23.8%
180−190
+23.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−29.3%
100−110
+29.3%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−40%
160−170
+40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−14%
260−270
+14%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−44.2%
60−65
+44.2%
Dota 2 126
−3.2%
130−140
+3.2%
Far Cry 5 79
−16.5%
90−95
+16.5%
Fortnite 100−110
−25.7%
130−140
+25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−39.1%
85−90
+39.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−48.8%
60−65
+48.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−46.5%
60−65
+46.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−46.1%
110−120
+46.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
+10.2%
85−90
−10.2%
Valorant 140−150
−23.8%
180−190
+23.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−29.3%
100−110
+29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−44.2%
60−65
+44.2%
Dota 2 120
−8.3%
130−140
+8.3%
Far Cry 5 75
−22.7%
90−95
+22.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−48.8%
60−65
+48.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−46.1%
110−120
+46.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−69.2%
85−90
+69.2%
Valorant 103
−76.7%
180−190
+76.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−25.7%
130−140
+25.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−35.4%
190−200
+35.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
−8.2%
50−55
+8.2%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−46.2%
35−40
+46.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−1.7%
170−180
+1.7%
Valorant 180−190
−18.9%
220−230
+18.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−33.3%
75−80
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−45.1%
70−75
+45.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−39.1%
30−35
+39.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−48.5%
45−50
+48.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−50%
65−70
+50%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 65
+20.4%
50−55
−20.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−26.5%
40−45
+26.5%
Valorant 110−120
−46.5%
160−170
+46.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−43.3%
40−45
+43.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Dota 2 76
−15.8%
85−90
+15.8%
Far Cry 5 26
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−60%
30−35
+60%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%

This is how RTX 3000 Max-Q and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 37% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600M is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600M is 38% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Max-Q is 20% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 77% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 64 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 18.41 25.79
Recency 27 May 2019 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 90 Watt

RTX 3000 Max-Q has 50% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
Pro W6600M Radeon Pro W6600M
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX 4060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
vs
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
A100 PCIe NVIDIA A100 PCIe
vs
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
GeForce MX570 NVIDIA GeForce MX570
vs
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh
vs
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
RTX 3080 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
A30X NVIDIA A30X
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
PRO W6500M AMD Radeon PRO W6500M
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
RX 5700 AMD Radeon RX 5700
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
Vega 7 AMD Radeon Vega 7
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 50 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.