Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Quadro Plex 7000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.25
Power efficiencyno data6.62
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF110Polaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,999 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×2640
Core clock speed574 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate36.74 ×234.62
Floating-point processing power1.176 TFLOPS ×21.385 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×216
TMUs64 ×232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length522 mmno data
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s ×264 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DVI, 2x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 65 Watt

Plex 7000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 823.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 7000 and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
Quadro Plex 7000
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 34 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 85 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 7000 or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.