RTX A4000 Mobile vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with RTX A4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 25 Watt
9.44

RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms Quadro P620 by a whopping 320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking460107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107GA104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed1177 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt140 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate43.33290.9
Floating-point performance1.386 gflops18.62 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.44
RTX A4000 Mobile 39.68
+320%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3643
RTX A4000 Mobile 15306
+320%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−304%
190−200
+304%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−313%
260−270
+313%
Hitman 3 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+550%
8−9
−550%
Metro Exodus 35
−300%
140−150
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+118%
27−30
−118%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−313%
260−270
+313%
Hitman 3 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+550%
8−9
−550%
Metro Exodus 28
−293%
110−120
+293%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+118%
27−30
−118%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−313%
260−270
+313%
Hitman 3 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+550%
8−9
−550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+118%
27−30
−118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−315%
170−180
+315%
Hitman 3 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−317%
250−260
+317%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Hitman 3 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−310%
160−170
+310%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

This is how Quadro P620 and RTX A4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 304% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P620 is 1275% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P620 surpassed RTX A4000 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 39.68
Recency 27 May 2019 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 140 Watt

Quadro P620 has 460% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 320.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation card while RTX A4000 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 576 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 20 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.