Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.68
+45.5%

P6000 outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking108200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.86no data
Power efficiency10.9753.86
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP102AD107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402048
Core clock speed1506 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8129.6
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.68 27.27
Recency 1 October 2016 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 45.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 89 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.