GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Quadro P6000

Place in the ranking	107	27
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.11	no data
Power efficiency	11.01	40.98
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP102	AD104
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	7424
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	1290 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	110 Watt
Texture fill rate	394.8	386.3
Floating-point processing power	12.63 TFLOPS	24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	80
TMUs	240	232
Tensor Cores	no data	232
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	384 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1127 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 432 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync II	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.99

RTX 4080 Mobile 65.49
+63.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15373

RTX 4080 Mobile 25176
+63.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90−95 −72.2%	155 +72.2%
1440p	60−65 −70%	102 +70%
4K	40−45 −70%	68 +70%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	66.66	no data
1440p	99.98	no data
4K	149.98	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	191 +0%	191 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	149 +0%	149 +0%
Elden Ring	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	135 +0%	135 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	71 +0%	71 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	383 +0%	383 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	127 +0%	127 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +0%	62 +0%
Dota 2	164 +0%	164 +0%
Elden Ring	257 +0%	257 +0%
Far Cry 5	127 +0%	127 +0%
Fortnite	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	351 +0%	351 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	157 +0%	157 +0%
Metro Exodus	61 +0%	61 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	113 +0%	113 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +0%	61 +0%
Dota 2	165 +0%	165 +0%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	323 +0%	323 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	122 +0%	122 +0%
Elden Ring	172 +0%	172 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	122 +0%	122 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
World of Tanks	400−450 +0%	400−450 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	78 +0%	78 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	41 +0%	41 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	237 +0%	237 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140 +0%	140 +0%
Valorant	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	53 +0%	53 +0%
Dota 2	144 +0%	144 +0%
Elden Ring	88 +0%	88 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	144 +0%	144 +0%
Metro Exodus	67 +0%	67 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	144 +0%	144 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +0%	20 +0%
Dota 2	157 +0%	157 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	122 +0%	122 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 Mobile is 72% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 70% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 70% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.99	65.49
Recency	1 October 2016	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	110 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 63.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.