Radeon HD 6790 vs Quadro P600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 with Radeon HD 6790, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.57
+105%

P600 outperforms HD 6790 by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking495680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.030.76
Power efficiency14.831.93
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP107Barts
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)4 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P600 has 825% better value for money than HD 6790.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384800
Core clock speed1430 MHz840 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8833.60
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm198 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s134.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.57
+105%
HD 6790 4.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3307
+104%
HD 6790 1618

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P600 4655
+61.2%
HD 6790 2887

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P600 4083
+89.9%
HD 6790 2150

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+92.3%
52
−92.3%
Full HD33
−84.8%
61
+84.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.392.44

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+128%
24−27
−128%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+34.9%
40−45
−34.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+128%
24−27
−128%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+34.9%
40−45
−34.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+128%
24−27
−128%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+34.9%
40−45
−34.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

This is how Quadro P600 and HD 6790 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 92% faster in 900p
  • HD 6790 is 85% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P600 is 3200% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6790 is 14% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is ahead in 64 tests (98%)
  • HD 6790 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.57 4.19
Recency 7 February 2017 4 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 104.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6790 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 6790 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 6790

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 210 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 153 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6790 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.