ATI Radeon X700 AGP vs Quadro P5200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.89no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGP104RV410
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)1 September 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1556 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million120 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate279.43.200
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs1608

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 44 Watt

Quadro P5200 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X700 AGP, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P5200 and Radeon X700 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon X700 AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
ATI Radeon X700 AGP
Radeon X700 AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 92 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon X700 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.