Radeon Pro V520 vs Quadro P520

Place in the ranking	604	170
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.98	9.82
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP108	Navi 12
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 May 2019 (5 years ago)	1 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2304
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	35.83	230.4
Floating-point processing power	1.147 TFLOPS	7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	24	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48.06 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P520 5.43

Pro V520 31.76
+485%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P520 2097

Pro V520 12257
+485%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21 −471%	120−130 +471%
4K	20 −450%	110−120 +450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
−456%

50−55

+456%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −471%	80−85 +471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −471%	80−85 +471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −467%	85−90 +467%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −471%	200−210 +471%
Hitman 3	10−12 −445%	60−65 +445%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −459%	190−200 +459%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −477%	75−80 +477%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −467%	85−90 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −479%	110−120 +479%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −483%	280−290 +483%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −471%	80−85 +471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −471%	80−85 +471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −467%	85−90 +467%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −471%	200−210 +471%
Hitman 3	10−12 −445%	60−65 +445%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −459%	190−200 +459%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −477%	75−80 +477%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −467%	85−90 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −479%	110−120 +479%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −483%	280−290 +483%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −471%	80−85 +471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −471%	200−210 +471%
Hitman 3	10−12 −445%	60−65 +445%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −459%	190−200 +459%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −479%	110−120 +479%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 −445%	60−65 +445%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −483%	280−290 +483%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−467%

85−90
+467%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −450%	55−60 +450%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −440%	27−30 +440%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −440%	27−30 +440%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −471%	80−85 +471%
Hitman 3	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −459%	190−200 +459%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−450%

55−60
+450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Hitman 3	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −450%	55−60 +450%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −440%	27−30 +440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−483%

35−40

+483%

This is how Quadro P520 and Pro V520 compete in popular games:

Pro V520 is 471% faster in 1080p
Pro V520 is 450% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.43	31.76
Recency	23 May 2019	1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	225 Watt

Quadro P520 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has a 484.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro V520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.