UHD Graphics 620 vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with UHD Graphics 620, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.50
+1117%

P5000 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by a whopping 1117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164802
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.20no data
Power efficiency12.5012.33
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048192
Core clock speed1607 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate277.324.00
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs16024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1127 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5000 32.50
+1117%
UHD Graphics 620 2.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12540
+1117%
UHD Graphics 620 1030

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+654%
13
−654%
1440p180−190
+1100%
15
−1100%
4K42
+425%
8
−425%

Cost per frame, $

1080p25.50no data
1440p13.88no data
4K59.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+817%
6
−817%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+775%
8
−775%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 0−1
Battlefield 5 100−110
+1213%
8
−1213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1000%
6
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+720%
10
−720%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+353%
38
−353%
Hitman 3 65−70
+871%
7−8
−871%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+253%
40
−253%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+5300%
2−3
−5300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+789%
9
−789%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+660%
15
−660%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+293%
30
−293%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 0−1
Battlefield 5 100−110
+2525%
4−5
−2525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+1071%
7−8
−1071%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+378%
36
−378%
Hitman 3 65−70
+871%
7−8
−871%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+315%
34
−315%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+5300%
2−3
−5300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+936%
11
−936%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+386%
14
−386%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+211%
35−40
−211%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+1223%
12−14
−1223%
Hitman 3 65−70
+871%
7−8
−871%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+2720%
5
−2720%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+714%
14
−714%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+1667%
3
−1667%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+211%
35−40
−211%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+1125%
4−5
−1125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1229%
14−16
−1229%
Hitman 3 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+886%
7−8
−886%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+1120%
5−6
−1120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+1150%
6−7
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+963%
16−18
−963%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Hitman 3 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+1225%
12−14
−1225%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+1700%
2−3
−1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%

This is how Quadro P5000 and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 654% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 1100% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P5000 is 425% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 5300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5000 surpassed UHD Graphics 620 in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.50 2.67
Recency 1 October 2016 1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 1117.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 620 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 177 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4343 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.