Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs Quadro P5000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 Mobile and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P5000 Mobile
2017
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.00

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P5000 Mobile by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking189148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.24no data
Power efficiency20.5729.71
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,885 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed1278 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate202.5259.2
Floating-point processing power6.48 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5000 Mobile 30.00
RTX 5000 Max-Q 34.67
+15.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5000 Mobile 11561
RTX 5000 Max-Q 13360
+15.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P5000 Mobile 20096
RTX 5000 Max-Q 26465
+31.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P5000 Mobile 44689
RTX 5000 Max-Q 53221
+19.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P5000 Mobile 14666
RTX 5000 Max-Q 19790
+34.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P5000 Mobile 86679
+33.8%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 64768

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

P5000 Mobile 401246
RTX 5000 Max-Q 433183
+8%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P5000 Mobile 3883
RTX 5000 Max-Q 7396
+90.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

P5000 Mobile 99
+20.8%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 82

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

P5000 Mobile 159
+29.5%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 123

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

P5000 Mobile 168
+21.5%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 138

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

P5000 Mobile 150
+21.5%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 124

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

P5000 Mobile 126
+0.9%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 125

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

P5000 Mobile 65
+4.3%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 63

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

P5000 Mobile 67
RTX 5000 Max-Q 97
+43.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

P5000 Mobile 15
+1.4%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 14

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

P5000 Mobile 67
RTX 5000 Max-Q 97
+43.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

P5000 Mobile 99
+13.2%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 87

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

P5000 Mobile 150
+20.5%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 125

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

P5000 Mobile 159
+28%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 124

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

P5000 Mobile 168
+11.8%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 150

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

P5000 Mobile 126
+0.9%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 125

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

P5000 Mobile 65
+1.9%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 64

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

P5000 Mobile 14.5
+1.4%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 14.3

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

P5000 Mobile 125
RTX 5000 Max-Q 184
+47.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−21.1%
109
+21.1%
1440p55−60
−20%
66
+20%
4K35−40
−25.7%
44
+25.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p20.94no data
1440p34.27no data
4K53.86no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
+0%
86
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+0%
101
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 189
+0%
189
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 93
+0%
93
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 182
+0%
182
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+0%
56
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 67
+0%
67
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 108
+0%
108
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
+0%
83
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
+0%
51
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85
+0%
85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+0%
48
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 143
+0%
143
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+0%
65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 53
+0%
53
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+0%
31
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27
+0%
27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 34
+0%
34
+0%

This is how P5000 Mobile and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 20% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 26% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.00 34.67
Recency 11 January 2017 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 5000 Max-Q has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
Quadro P5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 92 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 48 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.