UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Quadro P500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P500 with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P500
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 18 Watt
4.23

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms P500 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking683656
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.1111.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP108Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 January 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25648
Core clock speed1455 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1518 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate24.29no data
Floating-point processing power0.7772 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P500 4.23
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.56
+7.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P500 3022
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510
+16.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P500 2255
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321
+2.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P500 12868
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992
+24.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+11.1%
18
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−57.1%
11
+57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−12%
27−30
+12%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−28.6%
36
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−12%
27−30
+12%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 8
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−12%
27−30
+12%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+133%
12
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

This is how Quadro P500 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P500 is 11% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P500 is 133% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P500 is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 40 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.23 4.56
Recency 5 January 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 28 Watt

Quadro P500 has 55.6% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has a 7.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P500 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.

Be aware that Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P500
Quadro P500
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 30 votes

Rate Quadro P500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 464 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.