UHD Graphics 920 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.54no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameGP104Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1215 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate213.1no data
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 920 has a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4200 Max-Q and UHD Graphics 920. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 920 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 75 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.