Quadro P2000 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Max-Q Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5200
VS
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2200 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Quadro P6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q with Quadro P2000, including specs and performance data.

P4200 Max-Q
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
29.67
+57.5%

P4200 Max-Q outperforms P2000 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P4200 Max-Q P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking189291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.70
Power efficiency20.6917.52
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP106
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)6 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$585

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1215 MHz1076 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate213.194.72
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS3.031 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s140.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4200 Max-Q 29.67
+57.5%
Quadro P2000 18.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4200 Max-Q 11446
+57.5%
Quadro P2000 7268

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+54.5%
55
−54.5%
1440p30−35
+36.4%
22
−36.4%
4K27−30
+50%
18
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.64
1440pno data26.59
4Kno data32.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 77
+0%
77
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 7
+0%
7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how P4200 Max-Q and Quadro P2000 compete in popular games:

  • P4200 Max-Q is 55% faster in 1080p
  • P4200 Max-Q is 36% faster in 1440p
  • P4200 Max-Q is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.67 18.84
Recency 21 February 2018 6 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 5 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has a 57.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro P2000, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
L40 CNX L40 CNX
vs
Arc A570M Arc A570M
RTX 2080 Engineering Sample GeForce RTX 2080 Engineering Sample
vs
Steam Deck OLED GPU Steam Deck OLED GPU
RTX A500 RTX A500
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
vs
RX 7500 XT Radeon RX 7500 XT
RTX A4500 Max-Q RTX A4500 Max-Q
vs
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX TITAN Ada RTX TITAN Ada
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
G73B G73B
vs
ROG Ally Extreme GPU ROG Ally Extreme GPU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
vs
RX 6300 Radeon RX 6300
UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 631 vote

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.