FirePro W4150M vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking189not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.69no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Mars
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1215 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.120.40
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs14424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.31.2.170
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

P4200 Max-Q has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4200 Max-Q and FirePro W4150M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while FirePro W4150M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
AMD FirePro W4150M
FirePro W4150M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.