Matrox Parhelia APVe vs Quadro P4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking183not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.45no data
Power efficiency19.95no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGP104Parhelia-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)14 June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed1202 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate165.81.000
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1901 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX128.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4000 11623
+232360%
Matrox Parhelia APVe 5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2017 14 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 150 nm

Quadro P4000 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4000 and Matrox Parhelia APVe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox Parhelia APVe is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
Matrox Parhelia APVe
Parhelia APVe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 292 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia APVe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.