Quadro FX 2000 vs Quadro P400

Place in the ranking	679	1477
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.82	no data
Power efficiency	9.80	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code name	GP107	NV30
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 February 2017 (7 years ago)	21 January 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	no data
Core clock speed	1228 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1252 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	125 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	20.03	3.200
Floating-point processing power	0.641 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	16	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1002 MHz	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32.06 GB/s	12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

3x mini-DisplayPort

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0a
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.5 (2.1)
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P400 4.27
+8440%

FX 2000 0.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P400 1645
+9039%

FX 2000 18

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.27	0.05
Recency	7 February 2017	21 January 2003
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	130 nm

Quadro P400 has a 8440% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.