GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P400

Place in the ranking	680	274
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.50	no data
Power efficiency	9.84	27.92
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	TU116
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 February 2017 (7 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	1024
Core clock speed	1228 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1252 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.03	95.04
Floating-point processing power	0.641 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	16	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1002 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32.06 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

3x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P400 4.29

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+373%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P400 1648

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+373%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 −392%	59 +392%
1440p	9−10 −378%	43 +378%
4K	5−6 −400%	25 +400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	10.00	no data
1440p	13.33	no data
4K	24.00	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +0%	59 +0%
Elden Ring	57 +0%	57 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95 +0%	95 +0%
Metro Exodus	66 +0%	66 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Valorant	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30 +0%	30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +0%	32 +0%
Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Elden Ring	73 +0%	73 +0%
Far Cry 5	70 +0%	70 +0%
Fortnite	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75 +0%	75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	76 +0%	76 +0%
Metro Exodus	45 +0%	45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 +0%	29 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	48 +0%	48 +0%
World of Tanks	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +0%	52 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	29 +0%	29 +0%
Dota 2	112 +0%	112 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	63 +0%	63 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +0%	17 +0%
World of Tanks	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +0%	16 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +0%	22 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6 +0%
Dota 2	52 +0%	52 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

This is how Quadro P400 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 392% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 378% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.29	20.28
Recency	7 February 2017	23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	50 Watt

Quadro P400 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 372.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.