ATI Graphics Ultra XLR VLB vs Quadro P3200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking249not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.79no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGP104Mach32
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)1993 (31 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed1328 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm700 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate172.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)VLB
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5VRAM
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s80 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 700 nm

Quadro P3200 has a 614300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 and Graphics Ultra XLR VLB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while Graphics Ultra XLR VLB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
ATI Graphics Ultra XLR VLB
Graphics Ultra XLR VLB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 296 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra XLR VLB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.