GeForce MX150 GP107 vs Quadro P3200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking249not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.78no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)23 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed1328 MHz1469 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1532 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate172.836.77
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS1.177 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 23 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

Quadro P3200 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

MX150 GP107, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 and GeForce MX150 GP107. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX150 GP107 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GP107
GeForce MX150 GP107

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 296 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 GP107 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.