Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.55
+81.3%

P3200 outperforms Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking258410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.61no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792768
Core clock speed1328 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate172.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB3 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P3200 22.55
+81.3%
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.44

  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P3200 12555
+96.1%
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
4K28
+100%
14−16
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Atomic Heart 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+93.3%
45−50
−93.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 79
+97.5%
40−45
−97.5%
Fortnite 100−110
+81.7%
60−65
−81.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+90%
50−55
−90%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+100%
30−33
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Valorant 150−160
+91.3%
80−85
−91.3%
Atomic Heart 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+93.3%
45−50
−93.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+87.7%
130−140
−87.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Dota 2 119
+83.1%
65−70
−83.1%
Far Cry 5 74
+85%
40−45
−85%
Fortnite 100−110
+81.7%
60−65
−81.7%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+95.6%
45−50
−95.6%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+100%
30−33
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+97.5%
40−45
−97.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Valorant 150−160
+91.3%
80−85
−91.3%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+93.3%
45−50
−93.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Dota 2 112
+86.7%
60−65
−86.7%
Far Cry 5 70
+100%
35−40
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+106%
35−40
−106%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+100%
30−33
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Valorant 150−160
+91.3%
80−85
−91.3%
Fortnite 100−110
+81.7%
60−65
−81.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+90%
80−85
−90%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+83.2%
95−100
−83.2%
Valorant 190−200
+92%
100−105
−92%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+100%
30−33
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+100%
27−30
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Fortnite 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Atomic Heart 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+100%
14−16
−100%
Valorant 120−130
+89.2%
65−70
−89.2%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Dota 2 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Fortnite 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%

This is how Quadro P3200 and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 87% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.55 12.44
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm

Quadro P3200 has a 81.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7
308 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
125 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 or GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.