HD Graphics 630 Mobile vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.61no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792192
Core clock speed1139 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate157.224.00
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs11224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 30 August 2016
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 1 year.

HD Graphics 630 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and HD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics 630 Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Intel HD Graphics 630 Mobile
HD Graphics 630 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 20 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 5 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.