UHD Graphics P630 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile with UHD Graphics P630, including specs and performance data.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.90
+164%

P3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking318569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.2630.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Comet Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280192
Core clock speed1088 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate97.2028.80
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs483
TMUs8024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth168 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.90
+164%
UHD Graphics P630 6.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6520
+165%
UHD Graphics P630 2465

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+167%
24−27
−167%
4K31
+210%
10−12
−210%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+167%
45−50
−167%
Hitman 3 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1075%
8−9
−1075%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+179%
24−27
−179%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+167%
45−50
−167%
Hitman 3 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1075%
8−9
−1075%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+179%
24−27
−179%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+800%
9−10
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+167%
45−50
−167%
Hitman 3 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1075%
8−9
−1075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+267%
9−10
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+168%
40−45
−168%
Hitman 3 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+188%
40−45
−188%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Hitman 3 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+175%
8−9
−175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

This is how P3000 Mobile and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 167% faster in 1080p
  • P3000 Mobile is 210% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 1850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, P3000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics P630 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.90 6.39
Recency 11 January 2017 13 May 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 164.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 154 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.