Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs Quadro P2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking231not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.42no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP106Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 June 2019 (5 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280704
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate119.455.04
Floating-point processing power3.822 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs408
TMUs8044

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width160 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1251 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth200.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2019 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro P2200 has an age advantage of 1 year.

RX Vega 11 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2200 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 359 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.