Radeon Instinct MI250X vs Quadro P2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking226not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGP106Aldebaran
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 June 2019 (5 years ago)8 November 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128014080
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate119.41,496
Floating-point performance3.822 gflops47.87 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount5 GB128 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed10008 MHz3.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth200.2 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2019 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 500 Watt

Quadro P2200 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 2460% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2200 and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 342 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 123 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.