Quadro FX 470 vs Quadro P2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking291not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.62no data
Power efficiency17.51no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP106C79
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)12 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
Core clock speed1076 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt38 Watt
Texture fill rate94.724.640
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width160 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2017 12 September 2007
Chip lithography 16 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 38 Watt

Quadro P2000 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 470, on the other hand, has 97.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 and Quadro FX 470. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
Quadro FX 470

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 630 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.