GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Quadro P2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 with GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
18.86

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms P2000 by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29574
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.55no data
Power efficiency17.2427.26
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP106AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243072
Core clock speed1076 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72181.4
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs6496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.86
RTX 4060 Mobile 45.73
+142%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
RTX 4060 Mobile 17622
+142%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P2000 8387
RTX 4060 Mobile 35751
+326%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P2000 32964
RTX 4060 Mobile 90275
+174%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P2000 6847
RTX 4060 Mobile 26499
+287%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P2000 43566
RTX 4060 Mobile 154535
+255%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P2000 350317
RTX 4060 Mobile 598142
+70.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−100%
112
+100%
1440p22
−182%
62
+182%
4K16
−144%
39
+144%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.45no data
1440p26.59no data
4K36.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−320%
126
+320%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−112%
85−90
+112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−335%
135
+335%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−118%
130−140
+118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−233%
100
+233%
Far Cry 5 42
−114%
90−95
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−104%
100−110
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−67.8%
190−200
+67.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
−232%
123
+232%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−88%
170−180
+88%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−103%
130−140
+103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−88.2%
95−100
+88.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 77
−103%
150−160
+103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−51.1%
130−140
+51.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−112%
85−90
+112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−268%
114
+268%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−118%
130−140
+118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−183%
85
+183%
Far Cry 5 33
−173%
90−95
+173%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−104%
100−110
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−67.8%
190−200
+67.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
−216%
117
+216%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−88%
170−180
+88%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−103%
130−140
+103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−88.2%
95−100
+88.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−247%
215
+247%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−102%
85−90
+102%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−51.1%
130−140
+51.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−112%
85−90
+112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−216%
98
+216%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−157%
77
+157%
Far Cry 5 26
−246%
90−95
+246%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−67.8%
190−200
+67.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
−197%
110
+197%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−88%
170−180
+88%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−198%
185
+198%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−304%
101
+304%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+35.4%
65
−35.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−88.2%
95−100
+88.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−128%
80−85
+128%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−142%
45−50
+142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−324%
72
+324%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−345%
49
+345%
Far Cry 5 14
−250%
45−50
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−124%
230−240
+124%
Hitman 3 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−145%
90−95
+145%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−123%
75−80
+123%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−234%
127
+234%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−262%
76
+262%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−78.6%
200−210
+78.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−135%
70−75
+135%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−139%
40−45
+139%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Hitman 3 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−95.9%
190−200
+95.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−323%
55
+323%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−375%
19
+375%
Far Cry 5 7
−257%
24−27
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−127%
55−60
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−195%
62
+195%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−213%
25
+213%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−124%
35−40
+124%

This is how Quadro P2000 and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 100% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 182% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 144% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 35% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 Mobile is 375% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.86 45.73
Recency 6 February 2017 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro P2000 has 53.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 142.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 638 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3243 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.