GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs Quadro P2000

Place in the ranking	290	557
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.77	no data
Power efficiency	17.46	3.81
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GP106	GK104
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	8 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$585	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1536
Core clock speed	1076 MHz	771 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	797 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	122 Watt
Texture fill rate	94.72	102.0
Floating-point processing power	3.031 TFLOPS	2.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	32
TMUs	64	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	6.1	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60 +186%	21−24 −186%
1440p	21 +200%	7−8 −200%
4K	15 +200%	5−6 −200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+200%

10−11

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +200%	14−16 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +210%	10−11 −210%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +195%	21−24 −195%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +217%	12−14 −217%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Far Cry 5	42 +200%	14−16 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +183%	18−20 −183%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +195%	40−45 −195%
Hitman 3	35−40 +208%	12−14 −208%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +207%	30−33 −207%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +210%	21−24 −210%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +183%	18−20 −183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	77 +185%	27−30 −185%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +193%	30−33 −193%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +200%	14−16 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +210%	10−11 −210%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +195%	21−24 −195%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +217%	12−14 −217%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Far Cry 5	33 +230%	10−11 −230%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +183%	18−20 −183%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +195%	40−45 −195%
Hitman 3	35−40 +208%	12−14 −208%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +207%	30−33 −207%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +210%	21−24 −210%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +183%	18−20 −183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +195%	21−24 −195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +207%	14−16 −207%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +193%	30−33 −193%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +200%	14−16 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +210%	10−11 −210%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +217%	12−14 −217%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Far Cry 5	26 +189%	9−10 −189%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +195%	40−45 −195%
Hitman 3	35−40 +208%	12−14 −208%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +207%	30−33 −207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +195%	21−24 −195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +213%	8−9 −213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +193%	30−33 −193%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+183%

18−20

−183%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +200%	12−14 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Far Cry 5	14 +250%	4−5 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +197%	35−40 −197%
Hitman 3	21−24 +214%	7−8 −214%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +217%	12−14 −217%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +217%	12−14 −217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +220%	35−40 −220%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+210%

10−11

−210%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Hitman 3	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +223%	30−33 −223%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +225%	4−5 −225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+183%

6−7
−183%

This is how Quadro P2000 and GTX 780M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

Quadro P2000 is 186% faster in 1080p
Quadro P2000 is 200% faster in 1440p
Quadro P2000 is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.83	6.69
Recency	6 February 2017	8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	122 Watt

Quadro P2000 has a 181.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 62.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.