NVS 315 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	333	1124
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.07
Power efficiency	14.91	3.30
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP106	GF119
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	15 February 2019 (5 years ago)	10 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	48
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	523 MHz
Boost clock speed	1291 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,400 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	19 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.95	4.184
Floating-point processing power	2.974 TFLOPS	0.1004 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	72	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	875 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	14 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DMS-59

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.04	0.90
Recency	15 February 2019	10 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	19 Watt

P2000 Mobile has a 1682.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 275% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 315, on the other hand, has 294.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 315 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while NVS 315 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.