GeForce GTX 980M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Mobile with GeForce GTX 980M, including specs and performance data.

P2000 Mobile
2019
3.75 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.72

GTX 980M outperforms P2000 Mobile by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking354302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.3713.12
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP106GM204
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 February 2019 (6 years ago)7 October 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11521536
Core clock speed1291 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed1291 MHz1127 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate92.9551.84
Floating-point processing power2.974 TFLOPS1.659 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs7296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3.75 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display supportno data+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno data+
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus++
BatteryBoost-+
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P2000 Mobile 15.72
GTX 980M 19.14
+21.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P2000 Mobile 8387
GTX 980M 12517
+49.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P2000 Mobile 32964
+3.2%
GTX 980M 31944

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P2000 Mobile 6847
GTX 980M 9682
+41.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Mobile 43566
GTX 980M 65241
+49.8%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Mobile 350317
+6.9%
GTX 980M 327632

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P2000 Mobile 2046
GTX 980M 2805
+37.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

P2000 Mobile 60
GTX 980M 84
+40%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

P2000 Mobile 104
+150%
GTX 980M 42

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

P2000 Mobile 67
+1319%
GTX 980M 5

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

P2000 Mobile 70
+81.9%
GTX 980M 39

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

P2000 Mobile 65
+140%
GTX 980M 27

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

P2000 Mobile 23
GTX 980M 23
+0.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

P2000 Mobile 31
GTX 980M 47
+53.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

P2000 Mobile 5
GTX 980M 6
+11.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

P2000 Mobile 31
GTX 980M 47
+53.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

P2000 Mobile 60
GTX 980M 84
+40.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

P2000 Mobile 70
+81.9%
GTX 980M 39

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

P2000 Mobile 104
+150%
GTX 980M 42

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

P2000 Mobile 67
+1319%
GTX 980M 5

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

P2000 Mobile 65
+140%
GTX 980M 27

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

P2000 Mobile 23
GTX 980M 23
+0.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

P2000 Mobile 5.4
GTX 980M 6
+11.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
−23.6%
173
+23.6%
Full HD55−60
−30.9%
72
+30.9%
1440p27−30
−33.3%
36
+33.3%
4K21−24
−28.6%
27
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Fortnite 178
+0%
178
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Battlefield 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230
+0%
230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 68
+0%
68
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79
+0%
79
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+0%
61
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49
+0%
49
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 63
+0%
63
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40
+0%
40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 19
+0%
19
+0%

This is how P2000 Mobile and GTX 980M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is 24% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M is 31% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980M is 33% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980M is 29% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.72 19.14
Recency 15 February 2019 7 October 2014
Maximum RAM amount 3.75 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

P2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 980M, on the other hand, has a 21.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 113.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 980M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 111 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 342 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 Mobile or GeForce GTX 980M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.