GeForce 8600M GT SLI vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking333not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.91no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)G8x (2007)
GPU code nameGP106NB8P-GS
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 February 2019 (5 years ago)23 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores115264
Core clock speed1291 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1291 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million598 Million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate92.95no data
Floating-point processing power2.974 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount3.75 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 February 2019 23 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 3.75 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

P2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 275% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

8600M GT SLI, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 Mobile and GeForce 8600M GT SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 8600M GT SLI is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
GeForce 8600M GT SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 110 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.