ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking333not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.77no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP106Rage LT
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 February 2019 (5 years ago)1 November 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed1291 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1291 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate92.950.08
Floating-point processing power2.974 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs721

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount3.75 GB8 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s800 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 February 2019 1 November 1997
Maximum RAM amount 3.75 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 350 nm

P2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 21 year, a 47900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2087.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 Mobile and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile
ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 110 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.