RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	374	33
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	27.61
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP107GL	no data
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 July 2017 (7 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	7424
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

medium sized

large

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	16000 MHz
Shared memory	-	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

12 Ultimate

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.69

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.64
+336%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P2000 Max-Q 5285

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 23017
+336%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	47 −326%	200−210 +326%
4K	25 −300%	100−110 +300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−329%

90−95
+329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −332%	95−100 +332%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −322%	190−200 +322%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −329%	90−95 +329%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −321%	160−170 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −289%	350−400 +289%
Hitman 3	24−27 −323%	110−120 +323%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −323%	300−310 +323%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −335%	200−210 +335%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −321%	160−170 +321%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	72 −317%	300−310 +317%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −300%	300−310 +300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −332%	95−100 +332%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −322%	190−200 +322%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −329%	90−95 +329%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −321%	160−170 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −289%	350−400 +289%
Hitman 3	24−27 −323%	110−120 +323%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −323%	300−310 +323%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −335%	200−210 +335%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −321%	160−170 +321%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −322%	190−200 +322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	88 −298%	350−400 +298%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −300%	300−310 +300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −332%	95−100 +332%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −329%	90−95 +329%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −289%	350−400 +289%
Hitman 3	24−27 −323%	110−120 +323%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −323%	300−310 +323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −322%	190−200 +322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −300%	100−105 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −300%	300−310 +300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
−321%

160−170

+321%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −307%	110−120 +307%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −329%	90−95 +329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −333%	65−70 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −306%	65−70 +306%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −329%	300−310 +329%
Hitman 3	16−18 −312%	70−75 +312%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −307%	350−400 +307%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
−335%

100−105

+335%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Hitman 3	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −326%	290−300 +326%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 −317%	50−55 +317%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −317%	75−80 +317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−323%

55−60
+323%

This is how P2000 Max-Q and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 326% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.69	59.64
Recency	5 July 2017	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 335.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.