ATI Radeon Xpress 200M vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 with Radeon Xpress 200M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.58
+19200%

P1000 outperforms ATI Xpress 200M by a whopping 19200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4151474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.76no data
Power efficiency19.86no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)R300 (2005−2008)
GPU code nameGP107RC410
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6406
Core clock speed1493 MHz336 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.610.67
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.58
+19200%
ATI Xpress 200M 0.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4462
+20182%
ATI Xpress 200M 22

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.52no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 0−1
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 108 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+675%
8−9
−675%
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+143%
27−30
−143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 0−1
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 100 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+675%
8−9
−675%
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+143%
27−30
−143%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+675%
8−9
−675%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+143%
27−30
−143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 0−1
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P1000 is 1225% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P1000 surpassed ATI Xpress 200M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.58 0.06
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

Quadro P1000 has a 19200% higher aggregate performance score, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation card while Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress 200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 573 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 41 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.