ATI Graphics Vantage vs Quadro P1000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.88no data
Power efficiency20.02no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGP107Mach8
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)1992 (32 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1493 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.61no data
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16ISA 16 Bit
Length145 mmno data
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s40 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 800 nm

Quadro P1000 has a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 5614.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P1000 and Graphics Vantage. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Vantage is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
ATI Graphics Vantage
Graphics Vantage

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 572 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Graphics Vantage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.