GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro NVS 510M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 510M with GeForce RTX 4060, including specs and performance data.

NVS 510M
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.62

RTX 4060 outperforms NVS 510M by a whopping 8173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120958
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency1.2230.66
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 August 2006 (18 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed450 MHz1830 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2460 MHz
Number of transistors278 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80236.2
Floating-point processing powerno data15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2125 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s272.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 510M 0.62
RTX 4060 51.29
+8173%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 510M 238
RTX 4060 19763
+8204%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−13400%
135
+13400%
1440p0−166
4K-0−138

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.21
1440pno data4.53
4Kno data7.87

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 213
+0%
213
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
+0%
139
+0%
Atomic Heart 159
+0%
159
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 185
+0%
185
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 238
+0%
238
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Atomic Heart 94
+0%
94
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 221
+0%
221
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 215
+0%
215
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+0%
76
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+0%
111
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80
+0%
80
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 89
+0%
89
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67
+0%
67
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how NVS 510M and RTX 4060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is 13400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 51.29
Recency 21 August 2006 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 115 Watt

NVS 510M has 228.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060, on the other hand, has a 8172.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 510M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 510M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Quadro NVS 510M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7
3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1
21738 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 510M or GeForce RTX 4060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.