Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs Quadro NVS 440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV43 A4Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 February 2006 (18 years ago)3 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$96.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed250 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors146 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000336.0
Floating-point performanceno data10.75 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length187 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DMS-596x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 February 2006 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 230 Watt

NVS 440 has 641.9% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 440 and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440
Quadro NVS 440
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.