UHD Graphics 710 vs Quadro NVS 320M

Place in the ranking	1220	786
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.87	13.15
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	G84	Alder Lake GT1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	9 June 2007 (17 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	128
Core clock speed	575 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	289 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.200	10.40
Floating-point processing power	0.0736 TFLOPS	0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	22.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 320M 0.54

UHD Graphics 710 2.85
+428%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 320M 208

UHD Graphics 710 1100
+429%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−367%

14−16

+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Hitman 3	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−400%

5−6
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−367%

14−16

+367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−400%

10−11

+400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	2.85
Recency	9 June 2007	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	80 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	15 Watt

UHD Graphics 710 has a 427.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.