ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs Quadro NVS 320M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1220not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.87no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG84Rage LT
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date9 June 2007 (17 years ago)1 November 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed575 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors289 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.2000.08
Floating-point processing power0.0736 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs161

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s800 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.1
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 June 2007 1 November 1997
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 350 nm

NVS 320M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 337.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 320M and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M
ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.